My Little Pony: The Invasion MK II, Seventh Edition.

Lucy wrote:

Riv wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Riv wrote:

What I posted previously is subtle innuendo.

What the fuck is subtle about Princess Celestia eating out a pussy under a table?

Just because you can't see what's going on doesn't mean it's not offensive.

I feel rather betrayed, I thought that NSFW pictures would stay behind spoilers, as the rules state.

I even showed the pic to some brony friends of mine for input, they all replied the same as me.


You could never show a picture like that to a boss or co-worker, so it's NSFW.

You're being foalish. Educate yourself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work

Maybe you should read it, too.

Quote :

NSFW has particular relevance for individuals making personal use of the Internet at workplaces or schools which have policies prohibiting (even inadvertent) access to sexually provocative content.

The content was not sexually provocative, therefore the entire sentence is irrelevant.

Riv wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Riv wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Riv wrote:

What I posted previously is subtle innuendo.

What the fuck is subtle about Princess Celestia eating out a pussy under a table?

Just because you can't see what's going on doesn't mean it's not offensive.

I feel rather betrayed, I thought that NSFW pictures would stay behind spoilers, as the rules state.

I even showed the pic to some brony friends of mine for input, they all replied the same as me.


You could never show a picture like that to a boss or co-worker, so it's NSFW.

You're being foalish. Educate yourself. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_safe_for_work

Maybe you should read it, too.

Quote :

NSFW has particular relevance for individuals making personal use of the Internet at workplaces or schools which have policies prohibiting (even inadvertent) access to sexually provocative content.

The content was not sexually provocative, therefore the entire sentence is irrelevant.

...what the fuck happened

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Comedy.

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Wait, we had NSFW content that went unspoilered?

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Wait, we had NSFW content that went unspoilered?

Yup.

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Wait, we had NSFW content that went unspoilered?

Yup.

What the hell Riv, were supposed to spoiler that shit

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Wait, we had NSFW content that went unspoilered?

Yup.

What the hell Riv, were supposed to spoiler that shit

According to him it's not NSFW because you don't SEE any pussies. It's just lewd oral sex happening under a covered table. Perfectly fine not to spoiler, even if someone gets offended by it.

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Wait, we had NSFW content that went unspoilered?

Yup.

What the hell Riv, were supposed to spoiler that shit

According to him it's not NSFW because you don't SEE any pussies. It's just lewd oral sex happening under a covered table. Perfectly fine not to spoiler, even if someone gets offended by it.

...wait, so it wasnt NSFW?

NSFW would imply actual graphic sexual content, not an implication or something suggestive

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

...what the fuck happened

Riv posted sexual content, I found it gross and requested a spoiler, and an argument ensued somehow.

Wait, we had NSFW content that went unspoilered?

Yup.

What the hell Riv, were supposed to spoiler that shit

According to him it's not NSFW because you don't SEE any pussies. It's just lewd oral sex happening under a covered table. Perfectly fine not to spoiler, even if someone gets offended by it.

...wait, so it wasnt NSFW?

NSFW would imply actual graphic sexual content, not an implication or something suggestive

It's Princess Celestia giving Twilight oral sex under a table.

Would you get fired for showing that to a co-worker? Fuck yes you would, whether you see any actual pussy or not. Hence, Not Safe For Work.

It was just molestia stuff
Pretty tame for around here

And I'm pretty sure you'd get fired if you were browsing this forum at work, this whole place is pretty much NSFW in more ways than one

Porn is porn, whether it be softcore or not.

I just saw the image in question and I really cant classify it as a NSFW image

Its suggestive as fuck and has a very clear implication, but theres no actual visual of anything happening so it doesnt fall under the classification of something that needs to be spoilered. Were there no implication and instead were it showing something of actual graphic content, then yes, I would have come down on it like the hammer of the gods. But sadly, its not showing anything that would violate any of the rules of our NSFW conduct.

You guys dont have to spoiler suggestive content or sexual implications. Only graphic images.

Kaizy wrote:

I just saw the image in question and I really cant classify it as a NSFW image

Its suggestive as fuck and has a very clear implication, but theres no actual visual of anything happening so it doesnt fall under the classification of something that needs to be spoilered. Were there no implication and instead were it showing something of actual graphic content, then yes, I would have come down on it like the hammer of the gods. But sadly, its not showing anything that would violate any of the rules of our NSFW conduct.

You guys dont have to spoiler suggestive content or sexual implications. Only graphic images.

It's fucking porn. It doesn't have to have a nipslip for it to be offensive.

Which I find it very.

I don't care if you like pony porn, but put it behind spoilers so we who would rather NOT see Celestia eating Twilight out don't have to see it. Is that so fucking hard?

Yes, it is porn, as you can clearly tell what is happening. Just because you can't directly see it doesn't mean it doesn't belong behind spoilers. Some of us aren't cloppers and we'd prefer to keep our own MLP experience at least somewhat innocent. Put your sexual shit behind spoilers, god dammit.

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

I just saw the image in question and I really cant classify it as a NSFW image

Its suggestive as fuck and has a very clear implication, but theres no actual visual of anything happening so it doesnt fall under the classification of something that needs to be spoilered. Were there no implication and instead were it showing something of actual graphic content, then yes, I would have come down on it like the hammer of the gods. But sadly, its not showing anything that would violate any of the rules of our NSFW conduct.

You guys dont have to spoiler suggestive content or sexual implications. Only graphic images.

It's fucking porn. It doesn't have to have a nipslip for it to be offensive.

Which I find it very.

I don't care if you like pony porn, but put it behind spoilers so we who would rather NOT see Celestia eating Twilight out don't have to see it. Is that so fucking hard?

Alright, Im only going to tell you this one more time before I ban your ass because Ive been saying this for months now and Im getting sick of it.

Do not insult me.

Im dead fucking serious.

Dont imply I like pony porn and for that reason am being lenient on this like some fucking asshole. If those were furry/human/alien/whatthefuckever characters, I still wouldnt give two shits because it technically doesnt violate any rules. Its a preference. Youre simply saying "hey I dont want to see that, could you spoiler that for me?", which if asked nicely should usually be obliged, but now youre coming off in a really rude manner and lashing out at me and Im sorry but thats not how we handle our problems.

If you have a problem with an image, ask them nicely to spoiler it. If they dont want to and its a real issue, let me know. If I say that it doesnt violate any of the rules, then you go back to where you started and hope they want to censor it.

Had you simply asked me nicely to go back and spoiler the image for you, I probably would have accepted. Instead, you told me there was NSFW content that went uncensored, which there wasnt, and then when I explained why it doesnt classify as NSFW, you lashed out at me.

So now that said image is like 5+ pages behind, is this even a fucking issue anymore?

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

Kaizy wrote:

I just saw the image in question and I really cant classify it as a NSFW image

Its suggestive as fuck and has a very clear implication, but theres no actual visual of anything happening so it doesnt fall under the classification of something that needs to be spoilered. Were there no implication and instead were it showing something of actual graphic content, then yes, I would have come down on it like the hammer of the gods. But sadly, its not showing anything that would violate any of the rules of our NSFW conduct.

You guys dont have to spoiler suggestive content or sexual implications. Only graphic images.

It's fucking porn. It doesn't have to have a nipslip for it to be offensive.

Which I find it very.

I don't care if you like pony porn, but put it behind spoilers so we who would rather NOT see Celestia eating Twilight out don't have to see it. Is that so fucking hard?

Alright, Im only going to tell you this one more time before I ban your ass because Ive been saying this for months now and Im getting sick of it.

Do not insult me.

Im dead fucking serious.

Dont imply I like pony porn and for that reason am being lenient on this like some fucking asshole. If those were furry/human/alien/whatthefuckever characters, I still wouldnt give two shits because it technically doesnt violate any rules. Its a preference. Youre simply saying "hey I dont want to see that, could you spoiler that for me?", which if asked nicely should usually be obliged, but now youre coming off in a really rude manner and lashing out at me and Im sorry but thats not how we handle our problems.

If you have a problem with an image, ask them nicely to spoiler it. If they dont want to and its a real issue, let me know. If I say that it doesnt violate any of the rules, then you go back to where you started and hope they want to censor it.

Had you simply asked me nicely to go back and spoiler the image for you, I probably would have accepted. Instead, you told me there was NSFW content that went uncensored, which there wasnt, and then when I explained why it doesnt classify as NSFW, you lashed out at me.

So now that said image is like 5+ pages behind, is this even a fucking issue anymore?

1. I didn't lash out at you directly. I meant "you" as in "whoever is reading this, it only applies to you if you like it." The non-personal "you." So yeah, I wasn't meaning to insult you in any way.

2. You guys need to stop throwing around the word NSFW if you're not even going to use it correctly. NSFW means "Not Safe For Work," which indicates a picture or link of a sexual nature that is not safe for viewing at work. WHICH THAT PICTURE CLEARLY IS.

3. This issue is that you and Riv don't seem to care if someone is offended by a sexual picture. I don't understand you two at all.


Softcore porn is still porn, no matter what you say.

Lucy wrote:

1. I didn't lash out at you directly. I meant "you" as in "whoever is reading this, it only applies to you if you like it." The non-personal "you." So yeah, I wasn't meaning to insult you in any way.

2. You guys need to stop throwing around the word NSFW if you're not even going to use it correctly. NSFW means "Not Safe For Work," which indicates a picture or link of a sexual nature that is not safe for viewing at work. WHICH THAT PICTURE CLEARLY IS.

3. This issue is that you and Riv don't seem to care if someone is offended by a sexual picture. I don't understand you two at all.

1. I took it as a direct insult simply because I was the one responding to the situation and you have a past history of insulting me in these situations

2. If you really want to get technical and go by that definition, almost this entire forum is filled to the brim with unspoilered, uncensored NSFW content. And also, by that definition, I would have to spend hours censoring multiple posts and hounding everyone anytime they start swearing or post some image macro simply because its "NSFW". The definition I use to define NSFW is not he literal "Not Safe For Work" because I find that way too limited and somewhat vague, but instead "graphic adult content". I can be lenient with things like artistic nudes, and have even allowed those threads where you guys can spread pictures of your asscheeks around like hotcakes, but I will put my foot down if I see anyone posting uncensored graphic content. But like I said, this isnt what happened because the image is not graphic, its suggestive and implied. You have nothing of serious adult content as far as the visuals go, and sexual implication/suggestion is not warranted to be censored on the site. Im sorry but the image technically doesnt break any rules, its just upset one member. And on that note...

3. Its not that I dont take it seriously if someone is offended by a picture, its that I dont see how youre "offended" but more like "I dont really care for that and dont want to see it". Saying it offended you would imply that you saw it and its just hurt you in many ways, its caused you some serious distraught, or it purposely offended you because it mocks you or something you like/believe in. Honestly, its not that I dont take being offended by an image seriously, its just that I dont find this to even be a serious issue. Theyres cartoon horses on the internet. I think its safe to say anyone here has seen so much worse just browsing the FA front page for a couple minutes. I dont see how that image would "offend" you or anyone.

lul

Kaizy wrote:

Lucy wrote:

1. I didn't lash out at you directly. I meant "you" as in "whoever is reading this, it only applies to you if you like it." The non-personal "you." So yeah, I wasn't meaning to insult you in any way.

2. You guys need to stop throwing around the word NSFW if you're not even going to use it correctly. NSFW means "Not Safe For Work," which indicates a picture or link of a sexual nature that is not safe for viewing at work. WHICH THAT PICTURE CLEARLY IS.

3. This issue is that you and Riv don't seem to care if someone is offended by a sexual picture. I don't understand you two at all.

1. I took it as a direct insult simply because I was the one responding to the situation and you have a past history of insulting me in these situations

2. If you really want to get technical and go by that definition, almost this entire forum is filled to the brim with unspoilered, uncensored NSFW content. And also, by that definition, I would have to spend hours censoring multiple posts and hounding everyone anytime they start swearing or post some image macro simply because its "NSFW". The definition I use to define NSFW is not he literal "Not Safe For Work" because I find that way too limited and somewhat vague, but instead "graphic adult content". I can be lenient with things like artistic nudes, and have even allowed those threads where you guys can spread pictures of your asscheeks around like hotcakes, but I will put my foot down if I see anyone posting uncensored graphic content. But like I said, this isnt what happened because the image is not graphic, its suggestive and implied. You have nothing of serious adult content as far as the visuals go, and sexual implication/suggestion is not warranted to be censored on the site. Im sorry but the image technically doesnt break any rules, its just upset one member. And on that note...

3. Its not that I dont take it seriously if someone is offended by a picture, its that I dont see how youre "offended" but more like "I dont really care for that and dont want to see it". Saying it offended you would imply that you saw it and its just hurt you in many ways, its caused you some serious distraught, or it purposely offended you because it mocks you or something you like/believe in. Honestly, its not that I dont take being offended by an image seriously, its just that I dont find this to even be a serious issue. Theyres cartoon horses on the internet. I think its safe to say anyone here has seen so much worse just browsing the FA front page for a couple minutes. I dont see how that image would "offend" you or anyone.

1. Okay, I understand that. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

2. Sure, there's NSFW content around by that logic, even I post it. But if someone is offended and asks me to spoiler something, I'd do it. It's just one edit, I don't understand why one has to make a huge fuss about it.

3. I like MLP, and I don't want to see the characters I like in such sexual scenarios. Hence why I found the picture offensive. I didn't ask for it to be taken down and I didn't ask for Riv's head on a stick. All I wanted was a spoiler and a tag, and being denied that was what really pissed me off. I know there's pony porn on FA, and I can't do shit about that, but at least here I can request a damn spoiler. I don't think it's fair that I have to look at things that make me uncomfortable simply because it isn't the poster's idea of NSFW.

So back to Ponybusiness I suppose.

They have these Baby Spike toys out now. >////< I know I'm a brony cuz I sorta wanna buy it.

Lucy wrote:

1. Okay, I understand that. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

2. Sure, there's NSFW content around by that logic, even I post it. But if someone is offended and asks me to spoiler something, I'd do it. It's just one edit, I don't understand why one has to make a huge fuss about it.

3. I like MLP, and I don't want to see the characters I like in such sexual scenarios. Hence why I found the picture offensive. I didn't ask for it to be taken down and I didn't ask for Riv's head on a stick. All I wanted was a spoiler and a tag, and being denied that was what really pissed me off. I know there's pony porn on FA, and I can't do shit about that, but at least here I can request a damn spoiler. I don't think it's fair that I have to look at things that make me uncomfortable simply because it isn't the poster's idea of NSFW.

Thats true, but see Im not the one who posted it, nor am I the one who was asked to spoiler it. I simply came in, asked what the hell had happened, and explained how the rules work in this situation.

You can try to ask Riv to spoiler it again if its still an issue, but Im just letting you know that it technically doesnt break rules for him to not agree to censor it. Its just a matter of being polite on both ends.

I personally would, and I have, such as that time I sported a somewhat violent Scootaloo avy for about 5 minutes before Riv had actually asked me to change it, and I obliged.

Maybe we need to alter the rules some, then, because it really seems like they don't protect people's feelings if they're legitimately offended by something. It seems to me like the rules are "You're offended? Deal with it."

Lucy wrote:

Maybe we need to alter the rules some, then, because it really seems like they don't protect people's feelings if they're legitimately offended by something. It seems to me like the rules are "You're offended? Deal with it."

We do have rules for this, as I had mentioned

If someone is offended by something and it violates NSFW conduct, the image in question will be censored.

If someone is offended by something and it doesnt violate NSFW conduct, its between the poster and the offended member.

If it becomes a serious issue, I will delete all content from the past week and call it a night.

Kaizy wrote:

If someone is offended by something and it doesnt violate NSFW conduct, its between the poster and the offended member.

Therein lies the question...

What if the poster is an asshole?